Détails →
| ᐅᖃᐅᓯᖅ / Language : FR | EN | ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ | ᐄᔨᔨᐤ
NV
NordVoix ᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᒥ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᑦ
ᐅᑭᐅᕐᑕᕐᑐᖅ ᓄᓇᖃᖅᑳᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ 15 November 2026

New Brunswick First Nations Demand Sustainable Revenue Agreements Amid Election

As New Brunswick's provincial election approaches, First Nations communities push for long-term revenue-sharing agreements, with parties proposing varied solutions to replace outdated 1994 tax deals.

ᑐᓴᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐅᕙᙵᑦ Ku'ku'kwes News ᑕᑯᓗᒍ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᖓ →
📌 ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᖓᓱᑦ
- First Nations in NB seek sustainable revenue agreements after 1994 tax deals were terminated by Premier Higgs - Provincial parties propose different approaches: PC aims for new development agreements, Greens and NDP seek to revive or update old frameworks - Communities emphasize urgent need for funding to address housing, infrastructure, and cultural preservation

New Brunswick First Nations Demand Sustainable Revenue Agreements Amid Election

As New Brunswick's provincial election draws near, Indigenous communities are spotlighting revenue-sharing agreements as a critical issue. The termination of longstanding 1994 tax agreements by Premier Blaine Higgs has left many First Nations grappling with urgent needs in housing, economic development, and wellness.

Current Funding Landscape

Since Premier Higgs ended the 1994 agreements through a phone call during a meeting with chiefs, one-third of New Brunswick's First Nations have entered emergency funding partnerships with the provincial government. These include Eel Ground, Neqotkuk (Tobique), Welamukotuk (Oromocto), Amlamgog (Fort Folly), and Lno Minigog (Indian Island) communities.

These agreements direct funds toward economic, social, and cultural priorities, addressing immediate challenges while seeking long-term stability. However, communities stress that emergency measures cannot replace sustainable solutions.

Political Proposals Take Shape

The Progressive Conservative Party acknowledges the need for new frameworks but frames them as "development agreements" focused on Mi’kmaw and Wolastoqey priorities. They emphasize collaboration on housing, infrastructure, and economic development without referencing the previous tax-sharing model.

The Green Party, led by David Coon, proposes negotiating new agreements built on historical foundations, waiting for current deals to expire before implementing changes. Coon highlights observed positive impacts from past agreements during community visits.

The NDP, under Alex White, aims to restore former agreements and update existing ones through collaborative processes with First Nations. Meanwhile, Liberal candidate Julian Moulton for Carleton-Victoria emphasizes renegotiation in consultation with chiefs, aiming for long-term solutions that address both community needs and provincial interests.

Community Voices Call for Stability

First Nations leaders consistently stress that sustainable revenue-sharing mechanisms are essential for addressing systemic challenges. They argue that current emergency agreements fail to provide the stability required for long-term planning in areas like housing and cultural preservation.

With election promises shaping future policies, the outcome will significantly impact how Indigenous communities in New Brunswick access resources and maintain self-determination in governance and development.

💬 ᐊᐱᖅᑯᑎᒋᔭᐅᒐᔪᒃᑐᑦ

Why did Premier Higgs terminate the 1994 tax agreements? ↓
Premier Higgs terminated the agreements via a phone call during a meeting with chiefs, calling them "an unsustainable drain on the tax base."
Which First Nations have signed emergency funding agreements? ↓
Eel Ground, Neqotkuk (Tobique), Welamukotuk (Oromocto), Amlamgog (Fort Folly), and Lno Minigog (Indian Island) have entered emergency funding partnerships with the province.
What do First Nations want in new agreements? ↓
First Nations seek sustainable revenue-sharing agreements that address housing, infrastructure, economic development, and cultural preservation, moving beyond emergency measures.

ᐊᓯᖏᑦ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᑦ